safire sun debunked

I have my suspicions about tungsten fissioning and undergoing accelerated alpha decay under electric discharge, going back to the 1922 Wendt and Irion experiment where they exploded tungsten wires and reported seeing helium (a report they later retracted), and another related experiment that might have predated them. This presentation is to a general audience, perhaps to give a status report to laypeople on what they've done with the all of benefactors' money over the preceding few years. Or that is how I read it.Any explanation to why plasma oragnizes into layers?I do not think the plasma "organized into layers" as you say. DAVID TALBOTT recognized in Monty Childs' SAFIRE concept a real and empircal method for testing the Electric Sun model, and so invited Monty to propose his idea to the Electric Universe Group at the 2012 Electric Universe Conference. (SAFIRE team)www.lenr-forum.com in the WSC-Connect App on Google Playwww.lenr-forum.com in the WSC-Connect App on the App StoreYour browser has JavaScript disabled. Like David Talbott he immediately recognized a plausible way to test the Electric Universe hypothesis. I do not think it is an exaggeration to say that this gives a big boost to LENR research. The question that comes up that one does not have enough information to answer is whether they would be able to give a convincing presentation with solid conclusions to be defended in the more specialized mode before a room of other scientists. In recent decades observation of atmospheric conditions on the Sun have brought increasing attention to the fundamentals of solar physics. Is this what it will take to crack the door open to academia? If you are interested in the weird stuff that MFMP is finding, you will find more of it in this video. But let me pursue this a little further: there's a danger in implicitly drawing an equivalence between various outcast systems of thought and treating them all as equals. It's a subtle but important point to be made. The SAFIRE project got kicked in the teeth with LENR. Guys are doing great reasearch for the tiny fraction of cern,iter etc.Even better Eric, is to stick to the empirical data presented. Then, after the probe was thickened, and ceramic coated (reinforced), to prevent vaporization, it (probe) melted, and fractured "into layers". The SAFIRE project got kicked in the teeth with LENR. Downplayed it actually.

This video is unavailable. When they mentioned LENR, it was with some hesitation, but with a sense it had to be said.Their overall message was simple, and non-controversial: "we set out to prove one thing, and instead discovered some effects we never expected...help us to understand". Can it be due to the same machanism electrons surround ( not orbiting ) nucleus like in Mills model? Without their contributions, and fortitude in the face of their colleagues ostracisms, we would not be nearly so advanced as we are today. )From an engineering point of view, guys like Bob Higgins or Biberian alerted me that active tube from my own reactor would be leaking hydrogen at high temperatures because it's made of steel therefore Rossi are made of steel too..You can see in Axil's article he found, (thanks for him) that Saphire uses this property of leakage through a metal lattice to produce high concentrations of H +.Finally, background from retirees can't fight against imagination from youngest .. humor.To add, Dewey Weaver couln't understand this because he sponsors only old staffs..a question, If we now see similar phenomena. Proposal for an experiment to test the electric Sun hypothesis by David Talbott . It is what it is, and no flashy presentation can change what the analysis concludes. This chamber sits underwater, acting like a steam generator to create the steam to turn a turbine which in turn spins up an electrical generator. He heads the SAFIRE (Stellar Atmospheric Function in Regulation Experiment) project which aims to re-create certain features of the Sun in the laboratory with electrodynamics in mind.

Where have I read that before? And it gives us a vague sense of whether their findings, whatever they are, are going to make an impact on the larger scientific scene: we can conclude that they probably will not.With that context established, one's attention is freed up to focus in on the specifics of their observations as they relate to LENR so that they can be considered on their merits.Well said also, but when you start off saying "outcast system of thought" when referring to SAFIRE, are you not admitting some bias before even delving into the data? The phrase had been called to … a chemist by training who works with high energy reactions, he manages and oversees the design of eperiments, chemical studies, and statistical analysis and modeling.